Defenses Against Pennsylvania Sex Crimes

If you have been charged with a West Chester, Chester County, Pennsylvania sex crime, you may be feeling hopeless—and helpless. Society tends to look much more harshly at those charged with a sex crime than for any other offense, and the fact that you can be arrested, based solely on the word of another person, does little to alleviate those feelings. Because you were arrested as the result of an accusation, you may wonder what, if anything, stands between you and a conviction. Unlike other crimes, if you are convicted of a sex offense, not only will you serve your sentence (probably prison time and a large fine), once you have served that sentence, you will continue to repay your debt to society, possibly for the remainder of your life, in the form of the sex offender registry.  Get your defense team ready by contacting us now at (610) 692-8700.

Even some of the most minor sex offenses require registration on the Pennsylvania sex offender registry. You could be required to register for fifteen years—or for the rest of your life. If you are facing sex offense charges it is imperative that you contact an experienced Pennsylvania criminal defense attorney as soon as you have been charged (or earlier, if you have an idea you might be charged). There will be one thing standing between you and a conviction which will devastate your relationships, your job, your life. That one thing is an experienced attorney who will zealously fight for your rights and your future.

Whether you have been falsely accused of a crime you did not commit, or you made a serious mistake in your life, you need a person who will be in your corner from start to finish. Your attorney will understand the serious nature of a sex crime, and will do everything in his or her power to minimize the consequences you will face. While your defense will depend on the crime and the circumstances surrounding the crime, below you will read about some of the more common defenses used in allegations of a sexual crime.

Your Defense Begins Long Before Your Trial

If you have been falsely accused of a sex offense, your attorney knows the best time to attack the state’s case is before you ever get to trial. Since nearly all sex crime allegations are based on the word of the alleged victim, your attorney will thoroughly investigate that person and his or her background, to dispute the allegations. Most times, there must be an indictment from a grand jury against you before the prosecution can proceed with their case. Your attorney will work hard to avoid an indictment altogether, by presenting evidence to the grand jury which disputes your alleged victim’s claims. This evidence can include:

·     The criminal history of the alleged victim;

·     Education records;

·     A psychological evaluation of the alleged victim;

·     Test results of a polygraph given the alleged victim;

·     Evidence from others that the alleged victim has made similar false allegations on prior occasions;

·     Your lack of a criminal history;

·     Your education records;

·     Your psychological evaluation;

·     Your polygraph test results, and

·     Letters supporting your character.  

Defenses Used at Trial

If your attorney is unable to stop the grand jury from issuing an indictment against you, then he or she will spend the time until your trial preparing a solid defense on your behalf. Perhaps the most challenging part of a successful defense strategy in sex offense cases comes with dealing with the emotions that accompany the case. There can be deep, complex emotions in a sex crime case, which can overwhelm reasonable doubt. When the jury sees the alleged victim as a vulnerable person who has been abused by a monstrous person, those perceptions can be difficult to overcome—even if you are absolutely innocent of the charges. For this reason, having the most experienced criminal defense attorney by your side is more crucial than in any other type of criminal case. Your attorney may build your defense on one of the following common defenses in sex offense cases:

·     Actual innocence; i.e. you were misidentified, you were mistaken for someone else, or you were falsely accused as a result of revenge or anger on the part of the alleged victim. If you have a solid alibi for the time of the alleged offense, your attorney will have a much easier time with your defense. If you do not have an alibi, and you are the victim of false allegations, your attorney will have to show the jury what kind of person your accuser really is.

·     You have psychological issues which prevented you from understanding what you were doing. 

·     Affirmative defense—you admit you committed the offense, but because of extenuating circumstances, the offense should not be considered a criminal act. Some examples of affirmative defenses include:

Ø     You used no threat or force;

Ø     You did not place the alleged victim under duress at the time of the alleged offense;

Ø     The alleged victim consented to the sexual act;

Ø     In a statutory rape case, you were not more than three years older than the alleged victim.

·     If you are accused of sexual misconduct with a child, your attorney may be able to show that the child was subjected to biased and suggestive interviews, meaning the testimony was tainted. A parent, teacher, therapist or police officer may have asked the child leading questions, and the child, eager to please the adult could have answered “yes” to a question such as “Daddy touched you there, didn’t he?” The adult may or may not realize he or she is leading the child into a false answer, and may possibly be building false memories about an event that never happened. 

·     The police may have conducted an unlawful search and seizure if your alleged offense has to do with photographs or computer files. Illegally obtained evidence cannot be used against you in court.

·     Your attorney may be able to show that your accuser has specific motivation for alleging a sex offense against you, such as:

Ø     You are involved in a child custody dispute, and your child’s other parent is making false accusations of molestation or inappropriate sexual behavior in order to gain an advantage in family court. This could also happen in a contentious divorce—after all, if you are spending many years in prison, your ex will most likely receive all or most of the marital assets.

Ø     Your accuser is lying about what was a consensual sexual encounter, in order to protect his or her own reputation, or to hide a casual sex encounter from parents, other family members or friends.

Ø     You may have been accused of a sexual offense as a means of extorting money from you. This type of extortion is commonly seen in an employee bringing a false allegation against an employers or extortion associated with an extramarital affair.

How to Attack the Credibility of Someone Who Accuses You of a Sex Crime in Pennsylvania

Being accused of a sex crime in Pennsylvania is a serious matter. The consequences that come with a conviction may be life-altering and are not limited to the immediate aftermath of your charges. As such, it is important to take immediate action to ensure that your rights are protected. One of the most important steps in achieving this is attacking the credibility of whoever is accusing you of such a crime, especially if their claims are false or exaggerated. In this article, we will discuss some ways you can do this.

1. Analyze the Accuser’s Story Carefully

Your first step in attacking the credibility of your accuser is to carefully analyze their story. Look for inconsistencies in their claims and statements. Consider any evidence that may contradict their story. For instance, if they claim that the crime took place on a certain day, and you can prove that you were somewhere else at that time, it weakens their story. If they claimed you physically assaulted them, but there are no bruises or other physical injuries, that may also weaken their claim. In this stage, it is crucial to collect and keep any evidence that could support your case.

2. Conduct Background Checks on the Accuser

Another way to attack the credibility of your accuser is by conducting a background check. Look at their criminal history, if any, and whether they have had previous accusations of sexual misconduct that have proven to be false. This can help expose that the accuser may have a personal vendetta or motive to falsely report you for a sexual crime.

3. Utilize Legal Representation

A skilled legal representation can come in handy when attacking the credibility of your accuser. An experienced criminal defense attorney knows how to conduct a thorough investigation and how to pounce on inconsistencies in the accuser’s story. They also can locate any potential witnesses that might prove crucial to your defense. Your attorney will also consult with you and determine the best course of action and what evidence would be most effective.

4. Speak up and Fight Back

Finally, it would be best if you spoke up and fought back against the false accusations. In all cases of sexual misconduct, the accuser is granted sympathy and can gain public attention, even before any evidence is presented in court. In this case, you have to be assertive and address these claims as early on as possible. You should do this with the help of your criminal defense lawyer so that you do not say anything that could harm your case.

Being wrongfully accused of a sex crime in Pennsylvania can bring immense stress and emotional suffering. However, taking immediate action to attack the credibility of your accuser can help vindicate you of these false allegations. Always remember that seeking legal representation as early as possible can help you build a solid defense that will ultimately clear your name. This will also help you move on from the allegations and regain the trust of your loved ones and the community.

Can I Use A Victim’s Bad Character to Dispute Her Accusation of Sexual Assault in Pennsylvania?

Sexual assault is a serious crime in Pennsylvania, and if you are being accused of such, it can affect your life drastically. What happens if the accuser has a negative character or has committed a crime before? Can you argue that the victim’s bad character history should be admissible in court and dispute her accusation of sexual assault? In this blog post, we will take a closer look at this topic and see what Pennsylvania law says about using the victim’s character to dispute sexual assault accusations.

Pennsylvania’s rape shield law generally prohibits admitting evidence of the victim’s sexual history in sexual assault cases. However, if the victim’s history is relevant to the case, the court may allow its admission. For example, if the victim has been convicted of dishonesty, that information may be used to impeach their credibility during testimony. In such cases, proof of the victim’s bad character is essential, but it must not relate to the victim’s sexual character.

Pennsylvania’s Rule of Evidence 404 states that you may not use a victim’s character for a propensity inference in the case, which means you cannot use past instances of bad behavior to prove that the victim acted in a certain way in the current case. For instance, if the victim has a history of drug abuse or theft, the defense may not use those crimes to prove that their story of sexual abuse in the present case is less worthy of belief. However, some exceptions apply in Pennsylvania Law, which may allow a defendant to use a victim’s bad character to undermine their accusations of sexual assault.

If the victim’s criminal history is directly related to the case, the prosecution may agree that it is relevant and that it should be admissible. When the past history shows that the accuser has a motive to fabricate a sexual assault allegation, the prosecution may permit the defendant to introduce the history as evidence. For example, if the victim had a history of lying or manipulating in previous cases, it could be admissible to prove motive in a similar case.

It is important to note that this is not an easy feat. A defendant has to show that the victim’s past behavior is specifically related to the current crime. This means that the process to use the victim’s history and show that it is relevant is difficult. In addition, the judge will have to decide if the past information is essential to the case and will not unfairly prejudice the jury. In general, the victim’s bad character will not be admissible in the case.

In conclusion, Pennsylvania’s law is stringent when it comes to using a victim’s past criminal history in a trial. They state clearly that bad character cannot be used. However, there are some situations where the past history is vital in the case. If the victim’s history provides motive, it may be possible to use it as evidence. But this is an uphill battle for any accused person under Pennsylvania Law, and it is important to work with a skilled attorney who can help make the case for admissibility. If you are facing sexual assault charges in Pennsylvania, stay calm, seek legal advice and consider how your victim’s past behavior may affect your case.

Understanding Buyer’s Remorse Explained in Non-Consensual Sexual Accusations in Pennsylvania

Being accused of non-consensual sex can be a frightening and overwhelming experience. You may wonder how the allegations came about in the first place, especially when you believed both parties consented to the sexual act. In such cases, it isn’t unusual to hear people talk about ‘buyer’s remorse’ – suggesting the accuser changed their mind after the sexual activity. This may leave you with more questions than answers. Today, we’ll explore buyer’s remorse in the context of non-consensual sexual accusations in Pennsylvania and what it means for you.

To understand the concept of ‘buyer’s remorse’ in non-consensual sexual accusations, we must first understand what it means. In simple terms, it means a person changes their mind about an agreement after the fact. In sexual assault cases, it can mean an accuser regretting their decision to engage in sexual activity and accuses the other party of non-consensual sex. It is important to note that buyer’s remorse is not a defense against a criminal charge of rape or sexual assault.

Pennsylvania law states that an individual cannot consent to sexual activity if they are under the influence of drugs or alcohol or are mentally or physically incapacitated. This means if the other party was deemed incapable of giving consent, you could still be blamed for non-consensual sexual activity even if they initially showed signs of agreeing to it. If they later regret their decision, it could lead to accusations of rape or sexual assault.

Consent in Pennsylvania must be affirmative, voluntary, and informed, meaning both parties must verbally or physically agree to engage in sexual activity. If it turns out that the accuser says that they felt forced or intimidated or were coerced into participating in the activity, then it could establish that consent was not affirmative voluntarily or informed. This could also lead to allegations of non-consensual sexual activity.

If you have been accused of non-consensual sex in Pennsylvania, it is important to understand the seriousness of the charges. Even if the accuser later admits that the sexual activity was consensual, you may still face consequences, especially if the person was deemed incapable of providing consent. You may also encounter additional legal charges of drugs or alcohol to facilitate the sexual activity which can result in heavier sentencing.

Understandably, being accused of non-consensual sex, even with the concept of ‘buyer’s remorse,’ is a serious matter. You must take proactive steps in protecting your rights and ensuring that due process is followed. It would be best to seek legal advice immediately and speak with an experienced attorney specializing in sexual assault cases. Educate yourself on Pennsylvania’s laws and regulations regarding consent, drug, and alcohol abuse to prevent such accusations from happening in the future. Being informed will help you take the appropriate actions to protect yourself legally and professionally.

Corrupting a Minor’s Testimony in Pennsylvania Sexual Assault Cases

Sexual assault cases are some of the most delicate and complex in the court of law. The Pennsylvanian law provides strict guidelines on how such cases are handled, especially involving minors. However, people with ulterior motives often try to corrupt the testimony of minors in a bid to get away with sexual assault charges. In this blog post, we will look at how individuals can corrupt the testimony of a minor in Pennsylvania sexual assault cases.

1. Threats and intimidation: One common way people try to corrupt the testimony of minors in sexual assault cases is through threats and intimidation. The perpetrator may threaten the minor with violence or harm them or their loved ones if they disclose the assault. This action creates fear and leads the minor to change their testimony in the case.
2. Offering bribes: Another way people may corrupt a minor’s testimony is by offering them gifts or money in exchange for a favorable testimony. The perpetrator may bribe the minor directly or indirectly through family members or close relatives. This action creates a conflict of interest, and the minor may recant their testimony or provide false information to favor the perpetrator.
3. Coercion: Perpetrators may coerce minors into changing their testimony by using their power or authority. For example, a teacher or coach may threaten a minor with jeopardizing their future, such as scholarship opportunities, if they disclose the alleged assault. This action can also lead to the minor changing their testimony or providing inaccurate information.
4. Manipulation: Manipulation is another method used to corrupt a minor’s testimony in sexual assault cases. The perpetrator may twist the story or provide false information by using their persuasive skills to have the minor’s testimony in their favor. For example, a perpetrator may make a minor believe that the sexual abuse was an act of love and thus manipulate them into changing their testimony.
5. Using social media and technology: In recent years, perpetrators have started using social media and technology to corrupt the testimony of minors in sexual assault cases. They may share intimate pictures or videos of the victim to tarnish their reputation or expose them to ridicule in a bid to make them change their testimony. This method is particularly prevalent among teenagers who have access to social media platforms.

Corrupting the testimony of a minor in a sexual assault case is a heinous act that violates their rights and manipulates the course of justice. Pennsylvanian law does not tolerate the coercion of minors and has strict measures in place to punish perpetrators. If you suspect that someone is attempting to corrupt the testimony of a minor in such cases, alert the authorities immediately. Remember that minors have the right to protection and must not be subjected to any form of abuse in court proceedings.

Can a Minor’s Accusation of a Sex Crime Be a Hallucination, a Lie or Impressed in their Mind by Someone Else?

Sexual assault is a very serious crime that can leave life-long effects on the victim, including emotional scars, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and many others. Sexual assault can be committed by anyone, including minors, and it is important to take all accusations seriously and thoroughly investigate them. However, in some cases, a minor’s accusation of a sex crime may not be what it seems. In this post, we will explore whether a minor’s accusation of a sex crime can be a hallucination, a lie, or impressed in their mind by someone else.

Hallucination

It is possible that a minor’s accusation of a sex crime is a result of a hallucination. Certain mental illnesses, such as schizophrenia, can cause hallucinations that may seem real to the person experiencing them. In some cases, a minor may make a false accusation based on a hallucination. However, it is rare for someone to hallucinate a sexual assault as the brain’s response to such an event is to repress it.

Lie

When it comes to minors and sexual assault accusations, lying is not uncommon. Minors may create accusations out of a need for attention, emotional distress, or to frame others. Children can also be coached into accusing a person of a sex crime that never happened by an outside party. It is up to the authorities to determine whether the accusations are truthful by investigating the incident.

Impressed in their mind by someone else

A minor’s accusation of a sex crime may also be impressed in their mind by someone else. In some cases, the child may not have actually witnessed anything, but instead, the accusation was implanted in their mind by an adult, such as a parent, a teacher, or another trusted figure. This can happen when the adult may have had a personal vendetta against someone and planted the idea to the child.

Trauma and Suggestiveness

Sexual assault involving minors can be a tricky area. PTSD is a common condition after such encounters. Trauma can cause short- or long-term memory loss. The child may remember some fragments of the assault, but not every detail. This can cause them to recollect the incident incorrectly through suggestiveness by an adult familiar with the alleged perpetrator. Therefore, it is important to handle these cases with care and professionalism.

Accusations of a sex crime involving minors must be treated with utmost sensitivity and care. While the majority of these accusations are true, it is critical to ensure that the allegations are genuine, and every possible angle is explored. With that said, it is crucial to allow the authorities to investigate, and if the details of the accusation do not hold up, the supposed perpetrator deserves to have their name cleared. Remember, traumatic events such as sexual assault on minors can be both broad and complicated, therefore caution is advised when dealing with accusations of such nature.

How to Prove That A Victim’s Accusation of a Sex Crime Was Implanted by Someone Else

The world is not such a safe place. Every day, there are people who experience different forms of abuse, violence, and sexual assault. While the majority of these cases of sexual assault are indeed genuine, there are also cases where a false allegation is made. It’s a frustrating and distressing scenario for the accused because being accused of sexual assault could ruin their life. False allegations of sexual assault have been a long-standing problem, and often, someone else has planted them. But how can one prove that? In this blog, we’ll dive into the topic of how to prove that a victim’s accusation of a sex crime was implanted by someone else.

1. Look for inconsistencies in the case

When it comes to proving that a victim’s accusation of sex crimes is implanted, it is essential to start by carefully scrutinizing the case. Take a moment to go through all the facts. Mark all the inconsistencies you find, regardless of whether they refer to the victim, witnesses, or other parties involved in the case. Inconsistencies could include discrepancies in the victim’s accounts, possible discrepancies in witness accounts, or lacking or disputed evidence.

2. Expert opinion can help

Expert opinion plays a significant role when it comes to validating sex assault cases. Hire an expert in the field of psychology or psychiatry to review the available information and evidence surrounding the case to determine whether there may be any external circumstances or suggestions that might have influenced the behaviour of the accuser.

3. Understand the accuser’s background

Proving that a victim’s accusation was implanted may reveal more about the accuser’s background than the case itself. Take the time to investigate the victim’s history. Consider any mental or psychological issues that could have affected them in making such accusations or influenced their thinking or judgment. Speak to any psychologists, psychiatrists, or counselors that have treated the victim in the past. This information could highlight if the accuser’s history and mental state make it more or less likely that someone else may have suggested or encouraged them to make false allegations of sexual assault.

4. Assess the social environment

The social environment of an accuser can significantly impact their thoughts and decisions regarding the accused. In a bid to prove that a victim’s accusation of sex crimes was implanted by someone else, it’s crucial to take into account the social environment at the time of the alleged assault. For example, if the victim has been in contact with others who have made similar allegations, there are higher chances that they may have been suggested, influenced, or encouraged to make the same false claim. It’s also essential to evaluate whether the victim has been exposed to media covering similar cases of sexual assault, which may have influenced or suggested for the victim to make a false accusation.

5. Evidence

Finally, when it comes to proving that a victim’s accusation of sex crimes was implanted, evidence is crucial. If you have any evidence highlighting that the victim had no inclination to accuse you of any wrongdoing before the implantation, this could be useful. Evidence such as emails, chat logs or phone records can help to prove that any suggestion of your wrongdoing came from someone else, and it was not based on the victim’s original perception.

It’s a difficult and challenging situation when someone is falsely accused of sex crimes. While false allegations are rare, they still occur, often as a result of someone else’s manipulation. In such cases, it becomes essential to prove that the victim’s accusation of sex crimes was implanted. It’s important to gather as much evidence on the situation and seek the help of expert witnesses in the field of psychology and psychiatry to determine whether the accusation originated from an external force. It’s also necessary to investigate the victim’s history, their mental state, and dissect the social environment around them. Finally, it’s crucial to gather and present evidence demonstrating that the victim had no inclination to accuse you of any wrongdoing before the implantation. With careful attention, it is possible to prove that a victim’s accusation of sex crimes was implanted by someone else.

How Police Avoid Implanting Ideas into Minors’ Minds During Questioning

Questioning minors is a tricky issue for the police; they have to be very careful not to implant any ideas or words into the child’s mind. This is because the child may not fully understand the consequences of their words. Parents might not be present during questioning, in which case the child is more vulnerable to being manipulated. In this blog post, we will discuss the different techniques police use to question a minor without putting words or ideas in their mind.

1. Avoid Asking Leading Questions: One of the most important techniques that police use to question minors is to avoid leading questions. Leading questions are those that steer the child to provide an answer that the police officers want to hear, which can be quite problematic. Rather, they ask open-ended questions that let the child speak for themselves. This technique allows the police to get the full story without polluting the child’s mind with any leading questions.
2. Use Age-Appropriate Language: A crucial part of police questioning is using age-appropriate language. Police officers must use language that is easy to understand for the child. This language should be clear, concise, and free from any ambiguities that may confuse the young person. It is essential to ensure that the child fully comprehends the questions asked, as they may have difficulty understanding the language used in police procedures.
3. Build Rapport with the Child: Police officers handling minors’ questioning must establish a positive connection with the child. This helps to ease the child’s worries and create a comfortable environment for talking about sensitive issues. Officers can establish this rapport by making small talks before questioning, sharing personal stories, or even offering small gifts. This helps to build the child’s trust, which is crucial to make honest communication possible.
4. Finally, Record the Engagement: Lastly, police officers document and record every step of engagement with the child. This technique is essential in cases where the minor accuses the officer of impropriety during questioning. Recording the engagement will allow the courts to determine whether or not the officer led the child or implanted any ideas into his mind. The recording is also useful to ensure that the entire process of questioning goes smoothly.

In conclusion, questioning minors is a challenging procedure, and police officers must take special care during such interactions. Through preparing non-leading questions, using appropriate language, building rapport, and recording the engagement, police officers can avoid implanting ideas into minors’ minds during questioning while still gathering accurate information. These techniques help ensure that minors receive the necessary protection and justice they deserve.

Why Recorded Forensic Evaluation is Integral in Child Sex Crime Cases

The subject of child sexual abuse is one that comes with intense emotions and a range of stigmas; however, it is crucial to address child sexual abuse and ensure that abusers are held accountable for their actions. Many times, when it comes to prosecuting these types of cases, the evidence available is limited, and the only witness may be the child victim. Forensic interviews are one of the essential aspects of gathering evidence in these types of cases. It is paramount that these interviews are recorded, and this blog post aims to explain why.

1. Objective Record Keeping

Forensic interviews carried out by forensic experts trained to handle children can provide objective, neutral, and factual information. This means that all aspects of the interview are recorded, including the child’s behavior, affect, and responses to specific questions. While not all child abuse cases will result in a criminal prosecution, having a clear and detailed record of the interview will prove useful if the investigation leads to court.

2. Reducing Re-Traumatization

For a child who has undergone the traumatic experience of sexual abuse, recounting their story multiple times is not only stress-inducing but emotionally devastating. Through forensic evaluations, the child is interviewed once by forensic experts trained in child abuse investigations, thus reducing the number of times the child has to relive the experience. By reducing the number of times a child has to recollect their traumatic experience, the recovery process can be initiated sooner.

3. Making Factual-Based Decisions

Forensic evaluations are meant to elicit factual evidence about the assault or abuse. Providing reliable and relevant information is essential in prosecuting sexual abuse cases successfully. The ability to view the recorded interview can help the prosecution team to create a timeline or pattern of events, provide visual records that support the child’s testimony, and corroborate claims made by the child. Such factual information can also help the defense, especially where the child may have been coached or where false allegations were made.

4. Transparency

Adequate forensic evaluations of child sexual abuse provide transparency that can be useful to the justice system. The prosecution and defense might scrutinize these reports to gauge the testimony’s accuracy and as evidence in cross-examination. In some instances, the prosecution may choose not to continue with the case when the forensic interviewing reveals that the child’s allegations might not be grounds for a criminal offense.

5. Professional Standards

Forensic interview professionals take an oath, committing to perform their duties with impartiality, confidentiality, and with the utmost concern for the child’s welfare. They adhere to strict guidelines set by experts in the field of child trauma and abuse, as well as state and federal laws. They carry out their jobs with a scientific approach, ensuring that the interview is conducted appropriately, interviews are recorded, and reports are precise and factual.

Forensic evaluations of child sexual abuse are essential to the evidence-gathering process in sex crime cases involving child victims. Further, recording these interviews increases the accuracy, legitimacy, and reduces chances of re-victimization. The forensic experts conduct interviews with professionalism, while adhering to the strict guidelines laid out by states and federal laws. By utilizing a recorded forensic interview in child sex abuse cases, the victim can be protected, the evidence can be made clear, and the legal process can move forward.

You Need a Top Criminal Defense Lawyer for your Pennsylvania Sex Crime Case

If you have been accused of a sexual crime, you must act quickly to protect your reputation, your job, your family, and your future. The effects a conviction for a sex crime can have on your life are devastating—take the charges seriously, and contact a highly experienced Pennsylvania criminal defense attorney immediately.

The sex crimes defense attorneys of Ciccarelli Law Offices have successfully represented individuals throughout the state of Pennsylvania that have been accused of sexual assault crimes. Our Chester County based law firm is based at 304 North High Street, West Chester PA 19380 and serves clients in Kennett Square, Downingtown, West Chester, Coatesville,Exton, Chester Springs, Chadds Ford, Landenberg, Honey Brook, Oxford, Malvern, Parkesburg, Phoenixville and Paoli. Contact us now at (610) 692-8700 or call toll free (877) 529-2422. Don’t wait—contact an attorney immediately.